Learn more about our expertise: analyses, assessments and opinions.
All German election manifestos highlight the relevance of digital products and services that change the way we live and work. No longer a mere IT matter, digitalisation affects every political area. Following a period of technical dominance, questions of societal acceptance and political agenda-setting are becoming more important. Most manifestos therefore provide ideas and goals for digital policies in areas such as infrastructure, public administration, digital education, culture, media, sustainability, data protection and information security. The following analysis gives an overview.
Common ground in digital policies
All political election manifestos agree it is time to discuss and shape restructuring processes that have been triggered by the digital revolution. Naturally, core issues and overarching ideas differ. The Conservatives (CDU) and Social Democrats (SPD) keep an eye on how digitalisation may best be used. The two governing parties discuss ways to secure quality of life (CDU), social justice and risk management (SPD). Following a lengthy period of political insignificance, the Liberal Democrats (FDP) are focusing on digital opportunities for the private sector.
Depending on the election outcome, controversies may arise over the allocation of digital responsibilities. While the FDP is the only German party calling for a proper Digital Office, the Conservatives plan to hand over digital coordination to the Federal Chancellery. Moreover, the governing CDU intends to establish a ‘national digital committee’ to promote exchange between politicians and with national and international digital experts. The Social Democrats seem to be undecided. They allude to a plan for a dedicated commission set to organise a fundamental digital debate, so obtaining recommendations on how to combine digital support for economic and societal concerns.
Regulation in the digital age
The current legislative period has yielded new digital legislation. This is widely viewed as evidence that German politics is getting ready to regulate the digital industry more profoundly than in the past. The Social Democrats intend to increase regulation in areas such as data processing, media, copyright and anti-trust legislation, and anti-discrimination. Far-reaching regulation is possible, if the SPD continues to govern. In some instances, the plans of the SPD are similar to those of the Green and Left political spectrum, including the FDP. Germany’s FDP is the only party explicitly demanding a new framework for digital venture capital to support innovative corporate financing.
Data protection – what’s to come?
Across the parties, managing innovative technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) while ensuring data protection is paramount. This includes data use for commercial as well as research purposes.
The governing coalition’s position on the issue underwent some changes in the previous legislative period. Sceptical at first, the CDU and the SPD came to acknowledge the economic potential of data. The two parties now seek to combine harvesting opportunities while putting in place appropriate protective regulation. The SPD focuses on data sovereignty, transparency and a wider societal debate about the Digital Charter – to be supplemented by negotiated and legislative agreements that soften the more difficult consequences of the digital revolution. While the Conservatives plan a ‘Data Act’ to provide data access rules for economic purposes, the manifesto of the Liberal Democrats introduces a plan to restore the right of self-determination with regard to intelligence and data.
All German political parties are cautious about extensive data collection and increasingly powerful internet companies.
Views on digital policies in the European Union
Even though the governing Conservatives and LibDems want to protect the German economy, for example through merger control, most of the major parties are looking towards the EU. With regard to industry politics, the CDU plans to take advantage of the close relationship between Berlin and Paris. Following the cooperation in Airbus, the party advocates joint AI research and promotes European platforms for digital health and mobility. EU matters also play a part in the LibDem manifesto. The FDP favours a European digital single market with no barriers – a position also taken by the Green Party. This ties in with demands voiced by German companies for a European data protection guideline, as well as the creation of a European data pool to strengthen Europe’s digital hand in relation to US platforms.
Intersections and distinctions
All parties plan to expand the country’s digital infrastructure, this including new ideas for intelligent transportation. Their plans implicate investment in digital education and a more efficient e-administration, developing network neutrality for a level playing field. Disputes are expected to arise over the extent of future data protection regulation.
The Social Democrats differ markedly from the LibDems in areas such as health, agriculture, mobility and future working conditions. In terms of the latter, the FDP advocates a further loosening of labour laws and supports the sharing economy, which is surely good news for companies such as Uber. The SPD favours job training and close collaboration between legislative frameworks, labour agreements and operational configurations.
Now is the time to define clear responsibilities and jurisdictions. Given the pace of technological change, political room for manoeuvre is at stake. Individual interests must be avoided for the benefit of an all-encompassing digital strategy. It remains to be seen if the fundamental aspects of the digital revolution will be decided on as clearly and decisively as needed.
When viewing the party manifestos and the dynamics of the underlying technologies, it seems fair to assume that a ‘one step at a time’ approach will govern Germany over the next four years. Regardless of the election outcome, general goals and responsibilities have to be defined. In addition, processes at the start of the legislation need to be adapted while governing.